Cross References
- GAO-14-705T, July 23, 2014
The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) has testified before Congress
its preliminary results of an undercover testing of enrollment controls for health
care coverage and consumer subsidies under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act of 2010 (PPACA). The Act provides for the establishment of health insurance exchanges
(marketplaces) where consumers can compare and select private health insurance
plans. PPACA also expands the availability of subsidized health care coverage. The
Congressional Budget Office estimates the net federal cost of subsidized coverage at $36
billion for fiscal year 2014.
The law requires marketplaces to verify application information to determine enrollment
eligibility and, if applicable, eligibility for subsidies. These subsidies include the
Premium Assistance Credit under IRC section 36B, and the cost-sharing subsidy for individuals
with high-deductible plans. Individuals enrolling for health insurance through
the marketplace qualify for the Premium Assistance Credit when household income is
between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level for the family size involved, and
the individual does not receive health insurance through an employer or a spouse's employer.
Eligible individuals report their income to the health insurance exchange, and the
exchange calculates the amount of the subsidy and pays it directly to the insurance plan.
The difference between the health insurance premium and the subsidy is then paid by
the individual enrolled in the plan.
Results of the Undercover Testing
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) officials told GAO that they have
internal controls for health care coverage eligibility determinations. GAO's undercover
testing addressed processes for identity and income verification. The following is a summary
of the preliminary results.
For 12 applicant scenarios, GAO tested front-end controls for verifying an applicant's
identity or citizenship/immigration status. Marketplace applications require attestations
that information provided is neither false nor untrue. In its applications, GAO also stated
income at a level to qualify for income-based subsidies to offset premium costs and reduce
cost sharing. For 11 of these 12 applications, which were made by phone and online
using fictitious identities, GAO obtained subsidized coverage. For one application, the
marketplace denied coverage because GAO's fictitious applicant did not provide a Social
Security number as part of the test.
See printable version for remainder of article.
GAO Finds it Easy to Fake Application for Premium Tax Credit
Post Date: 8/8/14 |
Last Updated: 8/12/14 |
Return to Tax Industry News
Loading the PDF viewer…